This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hello Carl! Hello All! On Monday 17 November 2008 23:06:21 Carl Miller wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 07:34:07PM +0100, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > > Unfortunately, that breaks the *-cygwin tuples, that *are* 3-part tuples, and > > don't have a vendor part. config.sub does not recognise those tuples as valid > > *-cygwin tuples. Sad, but true. > > And I'd agree with it. In a four-tuple, the third position denotes OS > kernel, and the fourth position denotes OS environment or C library. > "pc" is clearly not an OS kernel. > > I'd argue that "i686-pc-cygwin" does indeed have a vendor already. > It's "pc". What it doesn't have is an OS kernel. Which can be uniquely > inferred from the OS environment of "cygwin". Which leaves us no choice but to have the mangling done on a per-{build,host}-OS basis, and not as a generic rule. Thank you, Carl, for this explanation! Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +0/33 662376056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | --==< ^_^ >==-- `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | `------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |