This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
* Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> wrote: > Building linuxthreads-based glibc is broken, as you just pointed out. Only > NPTL works (or should work) with glibc. It's a crosstool-NG limitation so > far. Ugh, can we fix it somehow ? I'm maintaining a bunch of old (even 2.4 kernel) system and like to use a crosscompiler for this. > But in the case of linuxthreads, that X-compiler is not built. So we can't use > it to build necessary C library. Where it becomes quite strange (IMPOV) is that > linuxthreads *should* *not* require that compiler. Anyway, it didn't when > crosstool-NG didn't support building NPTL. Since the time I introduced NPTL > support, the linuxthreads builds broke. hmm, do you have an idea where this break comes from ? cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce: http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions: http://patches.metux.de/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |