Re: i saw you web ,it gave me many helps thank u ~~~~~~~~~

["Dan Kegel" <dank at kegel dot com>]

On 7/18/06, ju zheng <juranjun@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7/17/06, ju zheng <juranjun@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > hello  i am a student from china .now i have to use a wireless
> > > network card on my armv4 .but the driver i found must run
> > > on gcc3.2.2 i think .because it run well on my friend's board
> > > which use gcc 3.2.2 .but mine is 2.95.3 .it has parse error when
> > > run ...
> > Use any crosstool with gcc-3.3.x, the glibc version and kernel
> > version don't matter.  Then when building the driver,
> > point it explicitly at *your* kernel source tree with -I.
> > Good luck... please send further questions to crossgcc@sourceware.org.
> ...
> thanks .i have used the crosstool to build successful on fc5.
> gcc-3.3.6
> cgcc-2.95.3
> glibc-2.2.2
> binutils-2.15
> linux-2.4.26
> hdrs-2.6.12.0

Glad to hear the compiler built.  Do your drivers build now?

> i have tried others .but many of them were fail . i don't know why .
> if i use the 2.6 kernel .it says oldconfig error .my pc run on fc5 .

Did you see the matrix of known good combinations at
http://kegel.com/crosstool/current/buildlogs/  ?
That records which combinations worked for me, and
what errors were found for the combinations which failed.

> could i only complied gcc if i only complied the drivers?

If you only want to compile kernel code, you don't need glibc.
(Well, you need *some* C library, but which one doesn't
matter, I think.  The one called 'newlib' is often a good choice as
it is simple and meant to be used without an operating system.
But I'm no expert, your milage may vary.)
- Dan

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq