This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more infromation.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: gcc assembler output

To: Stefan Petters <petters at lpr dot e-technik dot tu-muenchen dot de>
Subject: Re: gcc assembler output
From: Christian Robl <christian at qdev dot de>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 10:33:42 +0200
CC: crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com

Hello Stefan,

Am 24-Aug-00 schriebst Du: 
> Christian Robl wrote:
>> Btw. is it possible to change the %-notation for registers?
>> E.g. move.l %d0,%d1  -> move.l d0, d1
>> I found a define __REGISTER_PREFIX__ in lb1sf68.asm that should do the job,
>> but (un)defining this the build-process stops and says "__REGISTER_PREFIX__"
>> redefined (where is it in the gcc-source located too or can I define it with
>> a "-D" option to gcc at build-time?
> That's a bad idea, since what would distinguish register d0 from the address
> d0.
Well why not using "0x" or "$" prepending adresses and "#" for immediates, it
just has to be possible, like the syntax for A68k and other 68k-assemblers.

Regards,

Christian


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc assembler output
  - From: Stefan Petters

References:
- Re: gcc assembler output
  - From: Stefan Petters

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]