This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the CGEN project.
Re: make CGEN a less moving target?
Frank Ch. Eigler writes:
> The most important value is the base-insn-size. This should be
> large enough to include all opcode-like bits in the longest
> instruction, so most likely 16 or even 32 for this chip. Having
> real instructions that are shorter than that is not a problem.
If the definition of base-insn-size has been changed to this that's a bummer.
When did this go in?