This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Don't call lto-wrapper for ar and ranlib

From: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>, Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:10:55 +1030
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't call lto-wrapper for ar and ranlib
References: <20200221132043.275391-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com> <CAMe9rOoZVRWDpw1RefCYHG6N9tXv63TM5zRG+TgJMWWgJkn6SA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 04:58:40AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 5:20 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Since ar and ranlib don't need to know symbol types to work properly,
> > we should avoid calling lto-wrapper for them to speed them up.
> 
> Nick, Alan, is this patch OK for master?

Looks OK to me for both master and 2.34.

> Nick, is this patch OK for backport to 2.34 branch?

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Don't call lto-wrapper for ar and ranlib
  - From: Nick Clifton

References:
- [PATCH] Don't call lto-wrapper for ar and ranlib
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] Don't call lto-wrapper for ar and ranlib
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]