This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: binutils ld and new PT_GNU_PROPERTY segment

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
Cc: Fangrui Song <maskray at google dot com>, "Zhang, Annita" <annita dot zhang at intel dot com>, gnu-gabi <gnu-gabi at sourceware dot org>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 03:39:36 -0800
Subject: Re: binutils ld and new PT_GNU_PROPERTY segment
References: <a7078f74881daf23ca4af4983bac212a6c971b5a.camel@klomp.org> <CAMe9rOqCJVw2okDr0gonHWpxEVw+qO8uYLjbzxihB4tx-JuJ6g@mail.gmail.com> <20200219023120.gvr4ajolbjbqcfix@google.com> <dadc7c7f28171eae1fe537d0be4fa4fbdaf4eaab.camel@klomp.org>

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 2:58 AM Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 18:31 -0800, Fangrui Song wrote:
> >  From what I can see, neither the Linux kernel nor glibc uses
> > PT_GNU_PROPERTY.
> > glibc/sysdeps/x86/dl-prop.h parses PT_NOTE.
>
> That is my impression too.

See:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11285409/

It is for both x86 and arm64.

-- 
H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: binutils ld and new PT_GNU_PROPERTY segment
  - From: Mark Wielaard

References:
- binutils ld and new PT_GNU_PROPERTY segment
  - From: Mark Wielaard
- Re: binutils ld and new PT_GNU_PROPERTY segment
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: binutils ld and new PT_GNU_PROPERTY segment
  - From: Fangrui Song via binutils
- Re: binutils ld and new PT_GNU_PROPERTY segment
  - From: Mark Wielaard

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]