This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
[PATCH v6 2/5] x86: fold two JMP templates
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich at suse dot com>
- To: "binutils at sourceware dot org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 11:05:33 +0100
- Subject: [PATCH v6 2/5] x86: fold two JMP templates
- References: <820808ed-1126-1fca-e71f-9a8bd8d63f36@suse.com>
Now that the AMD64 check in match_template() applies to 64-bit code
only, the non-64-bit and the Amd64 template can be folded, as being
otherwise compatible with one another. (Oddly enough the same doesn't
apply to CALL, due to the suffixes it permits, while JMP doesn't
allow for any.)
opcodes/
2020-02-XX Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
* i386-opc.tbl (jmp): Fold CpuNo64 and Amd64 direct variants.
* i386-tbl.h: Re-generate.
---
v6: New.
--- a/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl
+++ b/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl
@@ -393,8 +393,7 @@ lcall, 2, 0x9a, None, 1, CpuNo64, JumpIn
lcall, 1, 0xff, 0x3, 1, 0, Amd64|Modrm|JumpAbsolute|DefaultSize|No_bSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Unspecified|BaseIndex }
lcall, 1, 0xff, 0x3, 1, Cpu64, Intel64|Modrm|JumpAbsolute|No_bSuf|No_sSuf|No_ldSuf, { Unspecified|BaseIndex }
-jmp, 1, 0xeb, None, 1, CpuNo64, Jump|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf|BNDPrefixOk, { Disp8|Disp16|Disp32 }
-jmp, 1, 0xeb, None, 1, Cpu64, Amd64|Jump|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf|BNDPrefixOk, { Disp8|Disp16|Disp32S }
+jmp, 1, 0xeb, None, 1, 0, Amd64|Jump|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf|BNDPrefixOk, { Disp8|Disp16|Disp32|Disp32S }
jmp, 1, 0xeb, None, 1, Cpu64, Intel64|Jump|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf|BNDPrefixOk, { Disp8|Disp32S }
jmp, 1, 0xff, 0x4, 1, CpuNo64, Modrm|JumpAbsolute|No_bSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf|BNDPrefixOk|NoTrackPrefixOk, { Reg16|Reg32|Unspecified|BaseIndex }
jmp, 1, 0xff, 0x4, 1, Cpu64, Amd64|Modrm|JumpAbsolute|No_bSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_ldSuf|NoRex64|BNDPrefixOk|NoTrackPrefixOk, { Reg16|Reg64|Unspecified|BaseIndex }