This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] i386: Only check suffix in instruction mnemonic


On 11.11.2019 18:04,  H.J. Lu  wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 3:06 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>> On the positive side this fixes MOVDIRI handling: Previously only
>> the operand-size less cases below would have been accepted, whereas
>> now all 6 valid ones remain without diagnostic.

(Leaving this in context for the question below.)

>> Btw, would you mind me putting in the testsuite parts of the
>> alternative patches I had sent for this PR?

[You didn't reply to this at all.]

>>         movdiri [rcx], eax
>>         movdiri dword ptr [rcx], eax
>>         movdiri qword ptr [rcx], eax
>>
>>         movdiri [rcx], rax
>>         movdiri dword ptr [rcx], rax
>>         movdiri qword ptr [rcx], rax
>>
>>         .code32
>>         movdiri [ecx], eax
>>         movdiri dword ptr [ecx], eax
>>         movdiri qword ptr [ecx], eax
>>
> 
> Can you submit a patch?

A patch to do what? Extend existing testcases? Shouldn't this
once again have been the job of the person adding support for
the insn?

Jan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]