This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 04/10] x86-64: generalize SIMD test expectations

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich at suse dot com>
Cc: "binutils at sourceware dot org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 12:42:16 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] x86-64: generalize SIMD test expectations
References: <a10770b5-f659-6259-6054-c0603f816e70@suse.com> <f766b1ce-fc87-f472-834a-5fcea6c16214@suse.com>

On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 7:26 AM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
> In order to be able to add/remove insns to/from the middle of these
> tests, generalize the patterns for the symbol reference comments of RIP-
> relative operands.
>
> gas/
> 2019-08-XX  Jan Beulich  <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
>         * testsuite/gas/i386/ilp32/x86-64-simd-intel.d,
>         testsuite/gas/i386/ilp32/x86-64-simd-suffix.d,
>         testsuite/gas/i386/ilp32/x86-64-simd.d: Redirect to parent dir
>         output expectations.
>         * testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-simd-intel.d,
>         testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-simd-suffix.d,
>         testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-simd.d: Don't hard-code hex addresses
>         and symbol-relative offsets.

OK.

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.

References:
- [PATCH 00/10] x86: operand size handling improvements
  - From: Jan Beulich
- [PATCH 04/10] x86-64: generalize SIMD test expectations
  - From: Jan Beulich

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]