This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: your binutils commits 90bd54236cb8b1c31c3662977159be971044c20d and e33f2313bf63b77763739732be14b469b4b647b7
- From: Nick Alcock <nick dot alcock at oracle dot com>
- To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "binutils\@sourceware.org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 20:29:17 +0100
- Subject: Re: your binutils commits 90bd54236cb8b1c31c3662977159be971044c20d and e33f2313bf63b77763739732be14b469b4b647b7
- References: <87imts2om2.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <af6831de-e4c2-5565-a4ba-520d098c2f1f@redhat.com> <87h89c0x07.fsf@esperi.org.uk> <0eada3c0-2879-f33e-8e0c-25d856def094@redhat.com>
On 3 Jun 2019, Nick Clifton verbalised:
> Hi Nick,
>
>>>> I have no particular preference -- but libctf not building on non-ELF
>>>> targets was a bug, and it's fixed: we shouldn't be suppressing it any
>>>> more.
>>>
>>> Agreed - I am trying to work out how to revert my original patch without
>>> actually breaking anything. I'll keep you informed.
>>
>> OK, great! Thank you!
>
> All my checks have passed, so I have now reverted the original patch.
Thanks!
I hope to have the tree building everywhere again fairly soon (testing a
fix for the most recently reported problems now). Sorry for the
prolonged breakage on multifarious platforms :(