This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] sim/common: Fix issue with wrong byte order on BE targets
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:27:49PM +0100, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> * Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> [2019-04-10 06:39:25 +0900]:
>
> > Currently only the OpenRISC sim uses this JOINSIDF() function to compose a
> > double float from 2 registers. The old code doesn't seem to work as the
> > work order gets swapped when running on a x86_64 host. This change
> > fixes that, but I am not sure if its the best thing to do.
> >
> > On mips they do similar reg pair floating point operations composing
> > doubles from 2 32-bit registers in sim/mips/cp1.c value_fpr().
> >
> > sim/common/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * cgen-ops.h (JOINSIDF): Fix big endian check.
> > ---
> > sim/common/cgen-ops.h | 8 ++------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sim/common/cgen-ops.h b/sim/common/cgen-ops.h
> > index 841552066f..d718394723 100644
> > --- a/sim/common/cgen-ops.h
> > +++ b/sim/common/cgen-ops.h
> > @@ -431,12 +431,8 @@ JOINSIDI (SI x0, SI x1)
> > SEMOPS_INLINE DF
> > JOINSIDF (SI x0, SI x1)
> > {
> > - union { SI in[2]; DF out; } x;
> > - if (CURRENT_TARGET_BYTE_ORDER == BFD_ENDIAN_BIG)
>
> I think this is the problem with the existing code, we're using memory
> on the HOST to perform packing / unpacking, and so its the byte
> ordering of the HOST that we care about here, not the target.
>
> If I change the above line to instead be:
>
> if (HOST_BYTE_ORDER == BFD_ENDIAN_BIG)
>
> then everything works fine.
>
> On inspection I believe all of the uses of CURRENT_TARGET_BYTE_ORDER
> in this file should be similarly replaced.
>
> I've attached a patch for this change. If you agree I'll go ahead and
> push it.
I tested this with the or1k testsuite and it does seem to work fine, thank you.
Please go ahead.
I thought I had tried this fix as well, I guess not.
-Stafford