Re: New linker testsuite failures for PR23658

["H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>]

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 7:57 AM Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi H.J.
>
>  We are getting some new linker testsuite failures:
>
> cr16-elf/ld/ld.sum:XFAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> crx-elf/ld/ld.sum:XFAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> d30v-elf/ld/ld.sum:XFAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> dlx-elf/ld/ld.sum:XFAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> fr30-elf/ld/ld.sum:XFAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> frv-elf/ld/ld.sum:XFAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> ft32-elf/ld/ld.sum:FAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> iq2000-elf/ld/ld.sum:XFAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> mips64el-openbsd/ld/ld.sum:FAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> mips64-openbsd/ld/ld.sum:FAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> mn10200-elf/ld/ld.sum:XFAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> moxie-elf/ld/ld.sum:XFAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> ms1-elf/ld/ld.sum:XFAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> msp430-elf/ld/ld.sum:XFAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> mt-elf/ld/ld.sum:XFAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> or1k-elf/ld/ld.sum:FAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> pj-elf/ld/ld.sum:XFAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> pru-elf/ld/ld.sum:FAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> visium-elf/ld/ld.sum:FAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> xc16x-elf/ld/ld.sum:FAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
> xgate-elf/ld/ld.sum:FAIL: ld-elf/pr23658-1
>
>   Would you mind taking a look please ?
>

ft32-elf and xgate-elf fail since they use the generic linker.  I am checking
in this:

diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr23658-1.d b/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr23658-1.d
index 252fb872ed..e21206b38a 100644
--- a/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr23658-1.d
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/pr23658-1.d
@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@
 #readelf: -l --wide
 # Since generic linker targets don't place SHT_NOTE sections as orphan,
 # SHT_NOTE sections aren't grouped nor sorted.
-#xfail: cr16-* crx-* d30v-* dlx-* fr30-* frv-* iq2000-*
-#xfail: m68hc12-* mn10200-* moxie-* mt-* msp430-* pj-*
+#xfail: cr16-* crx-* d30v-* dlx-* fr30-* frv-* ft32-* iq2000-*
+#xfail: m68hc12-* mn10200-* moxie-* mt-* msp430-* pj-* xgate-*

 #...
  +[0-9]+ +\.note\.4 \.note\.1 +

I am investigating others.

-- 
H.J.