This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] gold: Properly align the NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note

From: Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gmail dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 16:27:41 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gold: Properly align the NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note
References: <20180816174605.GA17648@intel.com> <f102674a-0c02-d78a-c5bc-ecb764cf7989@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOrfa2+YN5hgC4CMEM3ObOfys+kgEivfLnKxDxr11UxNaA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOq8BN7KyDPXN9ARQhXOncm=PcinKtdBTXgLjfG4YtQDBg@mail.gmail.com>

> Here is the updated patch to place note sections a PT_NOTE segment with the same
> alignment.
>
> OK for master?

Per discussion in the other thread, there is ongoing discussion about
what's right. So, no, not OK (at least, not yet).

-cary

References:
- [PATCH] gold: Properly align the NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] gold: Properly align the NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH] gold: Properly align the NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] gold: Properly align the NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]