This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] gold: Properly align the NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>, Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gmail dot com>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 17:25:37 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gold: Properly align the NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note
References: <20180816174605.GA17648@intel.com> <f102674a-0c02-d78a-c5bc-ecb764cf7989@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOrfa2+YN5hgC4CMEM3ObOfys+kgEivfLnKxDxr11UxNaA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOq8BN7KyDPXN9ARQhXOncm=PcinKtdBTXgLjfG4YtQDBg@mail.gmail.com>

On 08/17/2018 05:08 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:

The NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note should be aligned to 8 bytes for 64-bit
ELF as specified by gABI.  A note section can be only placed in a PT_NOTE
segment with the same alignment

This is not a review of the patch, but I like it much better if the goalis to align gold behavior with BFD ld for PT_NOTE construction.


Thanks,
Florian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] gold: Properly align the NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- [PATCH] gold: Properly align the NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] gold: Properly align the NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note
  - From: Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH] gold: Properly align the NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: [PATCH] gold: Properly align the NT_GNU_PROPERTY_TYPE_0 note
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]