On 09.08.18 at 10:20, <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> wrote:
On 08/09/2018 03:42 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 09.08.18 at 05:49, <liezhi.yang@windriver.com> wrote:
--- a/gas/as.c
+++ b/gas/as.c
@@ -1259,8 +1259,10 @@ main (int argc, char ** argv)
if (sib.st_ino == sob.st_ino && sib.st_ino != 0)
{
/* Don't let as_fatal remove the output file! */
+ saved_out_file_name = xstrdup (out_file_name);
out_file_name = NULL;
- as_fatal (_("The input and output files must be distinct"));
+ as_fatal (_("The input (%s, ino: %ld) and output (%s, ino: %ld) files must be distinct"),
+ argv[i], sib.st_ino, saved_out_file_name, sob.st_ino);
The if() condition guarantees both ino-s to be the same - why
print the same number twice? Instead, in your next patch,
Yes, "if condition" guarantees that, but we don't know that unless look into
the source code. However, the error messages seems not clear enough, so how
about change the message to:
as_fatal (_("The input '%s' and output '%s' have the same inode %ld"),
argv[i], sib.st_ino, saved_out_file_name))