This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: [Dwarf-Discuss] Asm syntax for DWARF 5 line table info
- From: <paul dot robinson at sony dot com>
- To: <nickc at redhat dot com>, <dwarf-discuss at lists dot dwarfstd dot org>
- Cc: <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 17:05:30 +0000
- Subject: RE: [Dwarf-Discuss] Asm syntax for DWARF 5 line table info
- References: <E3B07FDB86BFF041819DC057DEED8FEA0134155D47@USCULXMSG13.am.sony.com> <ea5a8824-5af6-91c6-b6ad-655b8c3cbeda@redhat.com> <E3B07FDB86BFF041819DC057DEED8FEA0134156632@USCULXMSG13.am.sony.com> <b8691b16-9380-7860-ec58-2e1a2a8b32dc@redhat.com>
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Clifton [mailto:nickc@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 10:01 AM
> To: Robinson, Paul; dwarf-discuss@lists.dwarfstd.org
> Cc: binutils@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] Asm syntax for DWARF 5 line table info
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> >>> I propose to add a new optional clause to the .file directive, like
> so:
> >>>
> >>> .file filenumber [ "directory" ] "path" [ md5 checksum ]
>
> This suggestion is fine with me. (And the file 0 enhancement).
Thanks!
> Are you offering to provide an implementation ?
I implemented it in LLVM. I am not offering to implement it in GNU binutils
as I can't say I know my way around there, or know the current state of
gcc/binutils support for DWARF v5 in general.
> It would help if you could file an enhancement request in the FSF binutils
> bugzilla system, so that we can track any further correspondence on this
> issue.
Sure. Is that sourceware.org/bugzilla? It doesn't seem to like the
account I created for gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla a few years ago, but maybe they
are separate? Private reply is fine.
Thanks,
--paulr
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>