This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: New gas testsuite failures
- From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich at suse dot com>
- To: "Nick Clifton" <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <igor dot v dot tsimbalist at intel dot com>,<binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 04:43:24 -0700
- Subject: Re: New gas testsuite failures
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <871sknc3q7.fsf@redhat.com>
>>> On 24.11.17 at 12:31, <nickc@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Jan, Hi Igor,
>
> I am seeing some new failures in the gas testsuite for various x86
> based targets:
>
> i386-darwin ... GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent,
> x86-64 SSE without AVX equivalent
> i386-lynxos ... GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent
> i386-pc-go32 ... GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent
> i386-rdos ... GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent
> i686-dragonfly ... GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent,
> x86-64 SSE without AVX equivalent
> i686-pc-beos ... GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent
> i686-pc-cygwin ... GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent
> i686-pc-elf ... GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent
> i686-pc-linux-gnu ... GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent, x86-64
> SSE without AVX equivalent, x86-64 (ILP32) SSE without AVX
> i686-pc-mingw32 ... GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent
> mingw32-pe ... GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent
> x86_64-pc-cygwin ... GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent, x86-64
> SSE without AVX equivalent
> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent, x86-64
> SSE without AVX equivalent, x86-64 (ILP32) SSE without AVX
> x86_64-pc-mingw64 ... GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent, x86-64
> SSE without AVX equivalent
> x86_64-solaris2 ... GAS REGRESSION: i386 SSE without AVX equivalent,
> x86-64 SSE without AVX equivalent
>
> Are these expected ?
No, this is my fault. I've stripped a little too much from a patch upon
H.J.'s request, and didn't re-run the testsuite after having done so.
I may not get to fix this today - is it okay to leave it broken over the
weekend, or should I revert that commit?
Jan