This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: I've broken my binutils version 2.28
- From: Matthew Fortune <Matthew dot Fortune at imgtec dot com>
- To: ANDY KENNEDY <ANDY dot KENNEDY at adtran dot com>, "'binutils at sourceware dot org'" <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 22:08:37 +0000
- Subject: RE: I've broken my binutils version 2.28
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <F9C551623D2CBB4C9488801D14F864C60154C56AE6@ex-mb1.corp.adtran.com>
ANDY KENNEDY <ANDY.KENNEDY@adtran.com> writes:
> My build error:
> Assembler messages:
> Warning: could not set architecture and machine
> internal error: can't hash `dmul': exists
> Fatal error: broken assembler, no assembly attempted
>
I believe this error occurs when identically named instructions are not in one
contiguous block in the opcode table. The patch snippet you posted does
not insert a dmul outside of the set of other dmul instructions though so
perhaps I am remembering wrong. Have you got another dmul somewhere else
in the opcode table?
Matthew