This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: testsuite results, binutils-2.29 branch
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On 06.07.2017 15:57, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>> Some updated test results for binutils builds from the 2.29 branch. I'm
>>> preparing an archive test rebuild using the new binutils, but will only be able
>>> to post results starting with Jul 17. Also found that glibc-2.24 fails to build
>>> in the check target on aarch64 and arm32 with the new binutils (see PR21725).
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>> amd64:
>>> no failures
>>>
>>> i686:
>>> Running /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp ...
>>> FAIL: Run pr19031
>>> FAIL: Run got1
>>> FAIL: Undefined weak symbol (-fPIE -no-pie)
>>> FAIL: Undefined weak symbol (-fPIE -pie)
>>> FAIL: Build ifunc-1a with PIE -z ibtplt
>>> Running /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/no-plt.exp ...
>>> FAIL: No PLT (dynamic 1b)
>>> FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1e)
>>> FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1f)
>>> FAIL: No PLT (PIE 1g)
>>>
>>
>> Please try master branch. It is clean for me on i686 with GCC 7 default
>> to PIE.
>
> yes, no failures, using GCC 6. Please could you backport the fixes to the 2.29
> branch?
Done. Please test binutils-2_29-branch.
--
H.J.