This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH, updated] Add support for setting disassembler-options in GDB for POWER, ARM and S390
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:14:16PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
> On 2/14/17 2:01 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > - Maintain the intended git commit log as an integral part
> > of the patch, and include it in patch re-posts, so that
> > any revision of the patch can be reviewed as a
> > self-contained entity. There's probably some rationale for
> > some changes to the tests that is written down in some
> > earlier intro, but was lost meanwhile.
>
> I'm not a git expert, as I'm paid to work on gcc and we still use
> subversion. I am willing to learn though, so can you explain what
> you mean by the above?
When you commit the patch to your local git repo, write your email
into the git commit message. Then (perhaps) trim that a little for
the push upstream. Take a look at "git log" for binutils-gdb. We are
quite verbose.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
- References:
- [PATCH, updated] Add support for setting disassembler-options in GDB for POWER, ARM and S390
- Re: [PATCH, updated] Add support for setting disassembler-options in GDB for POWER, ARM and S390
- Re: [PATCH, updated] Add support for setting disassembler-options in GDB for POWER, ARM and S390
- Re: [PATCH, updated] Add support for setting disassembler-options in GDB for POWER, ARM and S390
- Re: [PATCH, updated] Add support for setting disassembler-options in GDB for POWER, ARM and S390