Re: [PATCH][gold] Fix input sections ordering if a spec like "*(A B)" is used.

[Cary Coutant <ccoutant at gmail dot com>]

> An input section specification with more than one name template and
> without sorting instructions gathered all not yet processed input sections
> within its output section during the phase of setting addresses.

Thanks for finding this and for suggesting a fix.

I've fixed this a different way. Rather than setting
input_pattern_count to 1, I've added a new bin_count and used that
where appropriate, letting input_pattern_count remain a true count of
the input patterns. Also, simply adding an extra .x4 section to the
existing script_test_12 sources was sufficient to demonstrate the
problem.

-cary


2016-06-23  Cary Coutant  <ccoutant@gmail.com>
            Igor Kudrin  <ikudrin@accesssoftek.com>

gold/
        PR gold/15370
        * script-sections.cc
        (Output_section_element_input::set_section_addresses): Keep bin_count
        separate from input_pattern_count.
        * testsuite/script_test_12.t: Add another section .x4.
        * testsuite/script_test_12i.t: Likewise.
        * testsuite/script_test_12a.c: Likewise.
        * testsuite/script_test_12b.c: Likewise.

Attachment: pr15370b.patch
Description: Binary data