This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: ELF octets_per_byte


(My apologies if this is a repeat message ... the mailer-daemon kicked
the last one back ...)

Can you help me out with the process here, please?  I have submitted a
set of bugs, #'s 19713, 19715, 19716, 19717, and 19718.  

Fixing these, from my standpoint, is trivial since I already know what
needs to take place.  

Should I move forward by posting a patch to this list?  The patch would
expand the use of bfd_octets_per_byte--something that other
architectures define to '1', so the change shouldn't affect any other
architectures.

Please help me along here, thank,

Dan



On Tue, 2016-02-23 at 08:42 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Dan <dgisselq@verizon.net> wrote:
> > grep "FIXME" bfd/elflink.c | grep octets
> >
> >   /* FIXME: octets_per_byte.  */
> >   /* FIXME: octets_per_byte.  */
> >         /* FIXME: octets_per_byte.  */
> >         /* FIXME: octets_per_byte.  */
> >             /* FIXME: octets_per_byte.  */
> >       /* FIXME: octets_per_byte.  */
> >               /* FIXME: octets_per_byte.  */
> >
> > Would you like each of these in their own bug file?
> >
> 
> Yes.  And there may be more subtle bugs.
> 
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]