This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
I think I got the source of the problem. I was writing the
simple testcase that you asked me:
#include <stdlib.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
exit(0);
}
/bin/lm32-elf-gcc -c -o wrn-crt0.o wrn-crt0.S
/bin/lm32-elf-gcc -c -o rt-mturtle.o rt-mturtle.c
/bin/lm32-elf-gcc -c -o gcclm32-bug.o gcclm32-bug.c
/bin/lm32-elf-gcc -o gcclm32-bug.elf -nostartfiles wrn-crt0.o rt-mturtle.o gcclm32-bug.o -T wrnode.ld -lgcc -lc
/lib/gcc/lm32-elf/5.3.0/../../../../lm32-elf/bin/ld: internal error: addend should be zero for R_LM32_16_GOT
/lib/gcc/lm32-elf/5.3.0/../../../../lm32-elf/bin/ld: internal error: addend should be zero for R_LM32_16_GOT
In the file rt-mturtle.c I have my syscall stubs in order to avoid errors like:
newlib-2.2.0-1/newlib/libc/stdlib/exit.c:70: undefined reference to `_exit'
The problem is with the errno 'variable'. According to:
https://sourceware.org/newlib/libc.html#Stubs
for function like fork(), I followed the example:
#include <errno.h>
#undef errno
extern int errno;
int fork(void) {
errno = EAGAIN;
return -1;
}
The errno trick of undefining the macro and set the an external variable causes
the error:
/lib/gcc/lm32-elf/5.3.0/../../../../lm32-elf/bin/ld: internal error: addend should be zero for R_LM32_16_GOT
Of course. Now I'm able to compile without errors if I avoid to use errno. But
I do not thing is the right(tm) solution.
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 11:23:53AM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
Hi Federico,When I compile my code I get this message: ld: internal error: addend should be zero for R_LM32_16_GOT Then the compilation complete without errors (O_O) (like if that error is not an error but a warning)This is a bug. Either the code being linked is broken somehow, possibly due to a compiler or assembler error, and so the link should not have succeeded. Or else the error message is actually a warning about behaviour that the programmer (of the linker) was not expecting, and so the linker might not have behaved correctly. A simple testcase to reproduce the problem would certainly be helpful for whomever does investigate this problem.I do not understand what does this mean, and I cannot find information on the web. Any hint?Well the error message comes from the lm32_elf_relocate_section function in the bfd/elf32-lm32.c source file, where it is processing the R_LM32_16_GOT reloc. Exactly what this relocation is supposed to do and why its addend should be zero I do not know. It is presumably specified by the ABI for the LM32 architecture, but I could not find a copy of this document on the web. :-(If this is not the right place, can you redirect me to the right place?Probably the best person to ask would be the maintainer for the LM32 code - Jon Beniston. I have added him to the CC list of this email. Cheers Nick
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |