This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Vendor branches on sourceware.org's binutils-gdb repo
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- To: Matt Rice <ratmice at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, matz at suse dot de, aaro dot koskinen at iki dot fi, Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj at redhat dot com>, emachado at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com, GDB <gdb at sourceware dot org>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>, bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com, tuliom at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com
- Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 05:46:00 -0700
- Subject: Re: Vendor branches on sourceware.org's binutils-gdb repo
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <53406399 dot 9050303 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com> <m3vbunyoza dot fsf at redhat dot com> <20140406191404 dot GC7558 at drone dot musicnaut dot iki dot fi> <20140407035120 dot GA4186 at adacore dot com> <alpine dot LNX dot 2 dot 00 dot 1404071623060 dot 23408 at wotan dot suse dot de> <201404071452 dot s37EqLB9024528 at glazunov dot sibelius dot xs4all dot nl> <CACTLOFpGNYHiJqcJsHAo5b6AycH5hjJWmk3w8n7VDx9jvWeE5Q at mail dot gmail dot com>
> I would probably be happier if there was a separate repository
> binutils+gdb-vendor.git or some such though.
That would definitely adress all the issues I have. Not sure if
the sourceware sysadmins would agree or not to host it. If it was
accepted, we should probably move the old vendor branches to that
parallel repository as well, and start documenting its existence
on both GDB and binutils websites/wikis.
--
Joel