This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: ENTER/BOUND operands order.
- From: Michael Zolotukhin <michael dot v dot zolotukhin at gmail dot com>
- To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich at suse dot com>
- Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, "binutils at sourceware dot org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>, Sławomir Wojtasiak <slawomir dot wojtasiak at swksoftware dot pl>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:43:48 +0400
- Subject: Re: ENTER/BOUND operands order.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <3482868a668de8ebe53975eb7d79d725 dot qmail at home dot pl> <b4fcb2a62aa358bc134689ccd33eebcb dot qmail at home dot pl> <52D7A465020000780011423E at nat28 dot tlf dot novell dot com> <CANtU078BKxoUiKdmqp8ii0TFvi2T1itzzn7dicQoAbKzdwtRmg at mail dot gmail dot com> <52D807FE02000078001144A2 at nat28 dot tlf dot novell dot com> <CANtU07-s=VXv2yCb2FA_Dyco14d5LiC4of7r7zCkNa+4_omFxg at mail dot gmail dot com>
Just for the reference, we are talking about this document [1], right?
[1] http://download-software.intel.com/sites/default/files/319433-015.pdf
Michael
On 16 January 2014 19:38, Michael Zolotukhin
<michael.v.zolotukhin@gmail.com> wrote:
> This document "syntax" is not the actual assembly syntax. The
> presence of {er} or {sae} there just means the instruction supports
> those encodings. I agree that it could lead to some confusion, but
> this document describes instructions, not syntax.
>
> Unfortunately, there is no document describing the assembly syntax (at
> least, to my knowledge), and the tests are the best reference point we
> have.
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
--
---
Best regards,
Michael V. Zolotukhin,
Software Engineer
Intel Corporation.