This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [gold, strip] Question about the changed offset when stripping


On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Cary Coutant <ccoutant@google.com> wrote:
> This sounds related to PR gdb/11786:
>
>    https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11786

Hasn't that been fixed in GDB?

> -cary
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:04 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Alexander Ivchenko <aivchenk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> However, after updating to gdbserver 7.6 I was able to load the debug
>>>> info.. Also if I firstly just objcopy the linked binary (thus, erasing
>>>> the padding between .got.plt and .bss) and then strip
>>>
>>> sorry: I've accidentally sent it before finishing. I meant that if I
>>> firstly objcopy the linked binary (thus, erasing
>>>  the padding between .got.plt and .bss) and then strip it, then
>>> gdbserver<->gdb are successfully loading the debug info even for
>>> gdbserver < 7.6.
>>> That's cause in this case the addresses of all remained sections in
>>> stripped and not stripped binaries are the same.
>>>
>>
>> Please open a bug report with a testcase to show
>> the actual problem with GDB.  I will take a look.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> H.J.



-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]