This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] Facilitate deterministic pe executables between linker invocations
- From: Cory Fields <cory at coryfields dot com>
- To: nick clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Cc: binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 12:54:52 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Facilitate deterministic pe executables between linker invocations
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1380649206-19367-1-git-send-email-cory at coryfields dot com> <5256B553 dot 8040307 at redhat dot com> <CAApLimgHaLTS8cq9u1=wqU3y53b2ZteW9-EAf5ieM1pkqy==Xg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAApLimgC5uBv1xtQp=L8oShWJA3DQbYpsaT1ZX=WbH3D7SuGGA at mail dot gmail dot com> <5257DCED dot 7040004 at redhat dot com> <CAApLimj+FvRftHggFawg1crgah-KK98SGTRBBHE_gzMCxRaZWg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAApLimgsSvq7rGQQMsUSXHnKQ_UdyO1W8SdBhDnoxNKt2mNehA at mail dot gmail dot com> <528CE7E9 dot 1070402 at redhat dot com>
- Reply-to: cory at coryfields dot com
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:48 AM, nick clifton <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hi Cory,
> Sorry - my bad - I meant to send you a reply yesterday...
No worries. I don't make a habit of quick bumps. Many thanks for the
quick response this time.
>>> mingw's coff timestamp is set to an arbitrary number, to match the
>>> standard behavior of ld.
> OK. Presumable an arbitary value of zero is suitable ?
>>> A --use-real-timestamp (or so, maybe
>>> random-seed to match gcc?) is introduced to mimic the previous
>>> behavior if desired.
> I would prefer not to have completely random values, since they would be of
> no use whatsoever. A real timestamp should be fine.
> So, yes, please do go ahead and post the patch for this change. I do not
> anticipate there being any real problems with it...
Great, I'll send it along when I can get to it. Should be in the next few hours.