This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: A Proposal to Move to Git
- From: Steinar Bang <sb at dod dot no>
- To: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Cc: gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 19:51:45 +0200
- Subject: Re: A Proposal to Move to Git
- References: <8738q4gj7a dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <201308222010 dot r7MKAljG013904 at glazunov dot sibelius dot xs4all dot nl> <87wqnda0tm dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <CAMe9rOr1ivRrGs2GtJU3cXgYJAzEx-wdatuzoY9NBDmh4jJqpg at mail dot gmail dot com>
>>>>> "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>:
> I assume git repo has both binutils and gdb. Is that possible to only
> checkout binutils portion?
Not as such. There is something similar called sparse checkouts.
Eg. if your source is organized like
binutils/
gdb/
you can opt to checkout only
binutils/
in your working directory.
But it still will be organized as a binutils/ subdirectory at the top
level.
Ie. if you clone your binutils-only version of gdb+binutils like so
git clone git://somegitrepo.org/gdbbinutils.git binutils
you will have to do
cd binutils/binutils
to get to he interesting stuff...
Also the "user interface" for sparse checkouts kinda sucks:
- You set a git property
- You add lines to a text file saying what should be checked out
- You either do an initial checkout, or you use the little used command
git-read-tree to update the working directory
After this, git can be used normally (merge, add, commit, push).
If disk usage is an issue, I guess it could be useful...? You would
still have the entire git repo, though.