This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 08/02/2013 11:46 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Burlen Loring <bloring@lbl.gov> wrote:Hi All, This is my first binutils foray. I'm making use of libbfd to provide detailed stack trace in an app if it crashes. In testing I've found systems[*] with older binutils where bfd_find_nearest_line segv's. I'd like to configure my app to disable the stack trace feature on systems with the older binutils. Is there a preprocessor macro that can be used to idnetify the binutils release? if not what's the best way to determine the binutils version?Won't it be better to use libdwarf and not use bfd? BFD is not designed to be used outside of binutils/gdb. Any use outside of it I consider it a bug.
Andrew,That's fairly discouraging news. I was not aware of the intention to keep libbfd use internal to binutils/gdb. I will look into porting to libdwarf. However, if there's a reliable way to identify binutils versions it would be helpful. I'd like to make use of this code during the port.
Burlen
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |