This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Regarding "Inconsistency detected by ld.so"
- From: Sakthi <karthikeyan24s at hotmail dot com>
- To: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 06:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: Regarding "Inconsistency detected by ld.so"
- References: <1365433766502-227752 dot post at n7 dot nabble dot com> <1365438468344-227765 dot post at n7 dot nabble dot com>
PHDR 0x000034 0x25000034 0x25000034 0x00120 0x00120 R 0x4
INTERP 0x000154 0x25000154 0x25000154 0x0000d 0x0000d R 0x1
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld.so.1]
LOAD 0x000000 0x25000000 0x25000000 0x00af4 0x00af4 R E 0x10000
LOAD 0x000af4 0x25010af4 0x25010af4 0x00134 0x0013c RW 0x10000
/LOAD 0x000c28 *0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000 0x00000 *
0x10000/
DYNAMIC 0x000b10 0x25010b10 0x25010b10 0x00110 0x00110 RW 0x4
NOTE 0x000a94 0x25000a94 0x25000a94 0x00020 0x00020 R 0x4
GNU_EH_FRAME 0x000ab4 0x25000ab4 0x25000ab4 0x00014 0x00014 R 0x4
GNU_STACK 0x000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000 0x00000 RW 0x4
Any idea why these addresses are zero ?
In linker script, I explicitly mentioned *0x0f000000 *for this reserved
PT_LOAD section, but somehow not reflecting in the program header?
Any pointers?
--
View this message in context: http://sourceware-org.1504.n7.nabble.com/Regarding-Inconsistency-detected-by-ld-so-tp227752p227891.html
Sent from the Sourceware - binutils list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.