This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
PATCH: Check R_X86_64_standard for unrecognized relocation
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hongjiu dot lu at intel dot com>
- To: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:56:18 -0800
- Subject: PATCH: Check R_X86_64_standard for unrecognized relocation
- Reply-to: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Hi,
I checked in this patch to check R_X86_64_standard for unrecognized
relocation. I also added an error message when it happens.
H.J.
diff --git a/bfd/ChangeLog b/bfd/ChangeLog
index 48f94da..ec7d98f 100644
--- a/bfd/ChangeLog
+++ b/bfd/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
2012-12-21 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+ * elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_relocate_section): Check
+ R_X86_64_standard instead of R_X86_64_max for unrecognized
+ relocation.
+
+2012-12-21 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
PR ld/14980
* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Properly
adjust h->plt.refcount.
diff --git a/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c b/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
index 11ec917..92bf991 100644
--- a/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
+++ b/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
@@ -3207,8 +3207,11 @@ elf_x86_64_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd,
|| r_type == (int) R_X86_64_GNU_VTENTRY)
continue;
- if (r_type >= R_X86_64_max)
+ if (r_type >= (int) R_X86_64_standard)
{
+ (*_bfd_error_handler)
+ (_("%B: unrecognized relocation (0x%x) in section `%A'"),
+ input_bfd, input_section, r_type);
bfd_set_error (bfd_error_bad_value);
return FALSE;
}