This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: top-level configure.ac changes lost in sync

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl dot de>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:37:43 -0500
Subject: Re: top-level configure.ac changes lost in sync
References: <CAB=4xhr7RfysguRkfv+i2Hcu8W=9Uz4SSyBsX5SG1Lx5=B9Z-g@mail.gmail.com> <201211150205.qAF254D9022942@greed.delorie.com> <20121115210249.GD25927@lug-owl.de> <20121118215735.GF25927@lug-owl.de>

> =2E..or are changes to config.{guess,sub} always pre-approved if they
> originate from the upstream repo?

IIRC we've answered "yes" to this in the past.

A bit of sanity checking on the one pulling them in would, of course,
be a sensible step :-)

References:
- top-level configure.ac changes lost in sync
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: top-level configure.ac changes lost in sync
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: top-level configure.ac changes lost in sync
  - From: Jan-Benedict Glaw
- Re: top-level configure.ac changes lost in sync
  - From: Jan-Benedict Glaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]