This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Release 2.23 ?
On Oct 24, 2012, at 11:21 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 22.10.2012 16:20, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 22, 2012, at 6:44 AM, Kenny Simpson wrote:
>>
>>>>> No news for about 2 weeks. Is the release still
>>>> 'soon'?
>>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>> I hope to make the release next week.
>>>
>>> This week? Any blocking bugs/late fixes/etc.. ?
>>
>> Now released. I will announce it tomorrow.
>
> there seem to be more oddities with this release, maybe somebody could double-check.
>
> - bfd/doc has a lot of not-removed .texi files, which are not
> found on the branch.
Yes, that was part of the missing commit.
> 2.23/bfd/doc/aoutx.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/archive.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/archures.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/bfd.info
> 2.23/bfd/doc/bfdio.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/bfdt.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/bfdver.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/bfdwin.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/cache.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/coffcode.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/core.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/elf.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/format.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/hash.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/init.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/libbfd.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/linker.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/mmo.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/opncls.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/reloc.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/section.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/syms.texi
> 2.23/bfd/doc/targets.texi
>
> - the aarch64 ld testsuite is not included, the directory
> ld/testsuite/ld-aarch64 is missing.
As far as I know (but I might be wrong here), the aarch64 testsuite was not in the patchset I
backported to the release. Aarch64 people in CC:
Tristan.