This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Thanks H.J.Lu, for the review comments. As per the suggestion, I have re-used assembly files(arch-10.s and x86-64-arch-2.s) and created two new .d(objdump) files to do bdver2 specific testing. If the patch is fine, please check it in on behalf of me. Regards, Saravanan -----Original Message----- From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.tools@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 6:24 PM To: Ekanathan, Saravanan Cc: binutils@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR 14423 - Assembler doesn't recognize fma instructions in bdver2 core On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Ekanathan, Saravanan <Saravanan.Ekanathan@amd.com> wrote: > Hi, > The files (arch-10.s and x86-64-arch-2.s) already does fma testing but it doesn't test whether a specific core (bdver2) supports fma or not. > Re-using these assembly files and creating new .d(objdump) files with -march=bdver2 will not help, because these files have un-supported bdver2 instructions. > > So, is there a way to test a core against one/all of the supported instructions in the existing Assembler test framework? > If not, adding a new testscase for this bug is the only option I guess. > Regards, > Saravanan > You can create new *.d files, similar to arch-10-lzcnt.d/x86-64-arch-2-lzcnt.d, with -march=bdver2+.... -- H.J.
Attachment:
bdver2_fma.patch
Description: bdver2_fma.patch
Attachment:
testsuite.patch
Description: testsuite.patch
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |