This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch ld/dlltool]: Allow empty LIBRARY statement in .def file

From: nick clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
To: Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:45:02 +0100
Subject: Re: [patch ld/dlltool]: Allow empty LIBRARY statement in .def file
References: <CAEwic4YhM18R9Ns+1pRLV_a1CQXJHzKp3=7JCLSEPQ-zDsZEdw@mail.gmail.com> <CAEwic4Y7KpCKA9DhfJq_rU+D-6nrhoAMjozW68=2q_xqYTq7vQ@mail.gmail.com> <50113BD3.8040509@redhat.com> <CAEwic4aor4sJxvNT1r0wXGx-J3q016FAr3votew=dfCSz4_f4Q@mail.gmail.com> <50114107.4030808@redhat.com> <20120727180902.GA11585@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>

Hi Chris,

What about my observations?

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-07/msg00200.html

Shouldn't those be addressed before anything is checked in?

Yes they should.

Sorry about short-circuiting your observations. I posted my approval before I saw your email. :-(

Cheers
  Nick

References:
- [patch ld/dlltool]: Allow empty LIBRARY statement in .def file
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Re: [patch ld/dlltool]: Allow empty LIBRARY statement in .def file
  - From: nick clifton
- Re: [patch ld/dlltool]: Allow empty LIBRARY statement in .def file
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Re: [patch ld/dlltool]: Allow empty LIBRARY statement in .def file
  - From: nick clifton
- Re: [patch ld/dlltool]: Allow empty LIBRARY statement in .def file
  - From: Christopher Faylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]