This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option

From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano dot lattarini at gmail dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: 11034 at debbugs dot gnu dot org, gdb at sourceware dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sourceware dot org, Automake List <automake at gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:42:10 +0200
Subject: Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option
References: <4F72E239.9010404@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1203281121190.12161@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4F7301DD.7090401@gmail.com> <4F76ECBA.4010303@gmail.com>

On 03/31/2012 01:38 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On 03/28/2012 02:19 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> Hi Joseph, thanks for the feedback.
>> On 03/28/2012 01:24 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there better transition documentation somewhere?
>>>
>> Nope, but it would be a good idea to prepare it before starting to deprecate
>> the 'cygnus' option.  Maybe even for 1.12.  Thanks for the suggestion.
>>
> Or even for 1.11.4, which is to be released in two/three days.  What about the
> attached patch?  I will push it by this evening if there is no objection.
> 
Applied to maint, merged into master and branch-1.11, and pushed.

Regards,
  Stefano

References:
- Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option
  - From: Stefano Lattarini
- Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option
  - From: Stefano Lattarini
- Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option
  - From: Stefano Lattarini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]