This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Gnu assembler fsub "bug" status
- From: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>
- To: Michael Guyver <michael dot guyver at gmail dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:12:56 +1030
- Subject: Re: Gnu assembler fsub "bug" status
- References: <CAJO-WbeWoqCVo3vPX2a=e-0WL6LRFbMbWTp=NcxEfM0xotXRQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJO-WbdyHy+o=B4c-0x_6eS4eOeAyjj566--yj7J=Xr+9FdQqg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJO-WbfN0Zyfnv0EsTbCZ3TG_vbMuAugLS=a95iRXB59iJ3oPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJO-Wbc2AHahtjS1AUKcrzR_z3pgsXimC1shdD67qnJONBBBEw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 01:19:34PM +0000, Michael Guyver wrote:
> assembly code? If I specify .intel_mnemonic (and therefore get
> .intel_syntax), have all my operands changed place?
You could easily try this out yourself, and would find your assumption
that .intel_mnemonic implied .intel_syntax is false. (It was that way
in the gas sources for less than two weeks.) HJ, please fix the gas
docs for .intel_mnemonic.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM