This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Release 2.22: Next week ...


On Nov 18, 2011, at 8:47 AM, Doug Kwan (éæå) wrote:

> Tristan,
> 
> If you don't mind, can I also backport these gold's ARM fixes for test
> regression?
> 
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2011-11/msg00047.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2011-11/msg00041.html
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2011-11/msg00043.html

Done.

> 
> -Doug
> 
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Nov 17, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Matthew Gretton-Dann wrote:
>> 
>>> On 17/11/11 14:50, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>>> On Nov 9, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I plan to make the 2.22 release next week.
>>>>> There are still a few pending back ports: micromips and 'V2 of get symbol linker plugin interface' come to my mind.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As usual, speak up if you think I missed something.
>>>> 
>>>> I have run the testsuite for most of the targets.  I think there aren't blocking regressions for a 22.0, although I think it would be nice to clean-up arm-eabi and mips*-* for the 22.1
>>> 
>>>> arm-eabi: FAIL: R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 Relocation veneers: Long
>>>> arm-eabi: FAIL: R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 Relocation veneers: Short 1
>>>> arm-eabi: FAIL: R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 Relocation veneers: Short 2
>>> 
>>> I thought I had fixed these with:
>>>       http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-11/msg00072.html
>>> 
>>> Which was committed:
>>>       http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2011-11/msg00042.html
>>> 
>>> When I run the tests myself targetting arm-none-eabi they pass, as they also (I am assuming) in your arm-linux-gnueabi run (you didn't highlight them there).
>> 
>> Yes, I was surprised too.
>> 
>>> Do you mind sending me the appropriate part of ld.log from the testrun and I will try to see if I can reproduce the failure?
>> 
>> Sure:
>> 
>> /tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/objs-arm-eabi/ld/../gas/as-new    -o tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers.o -march=armv7-a -mthumb /tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/binutils-2.21.90/ld/testsuite/ld-arm/jump-reloc-veneers.s
>> Executing on host: sh -c {/tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/objs-arm-eabi/ld/../gas/as-new    -o tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers.o -march=armv7-a -mthumb /tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/binutils-2.21.90/ld/testsuite/ld-arm/jump-reloc-veneers.s 2>&1}  /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
>> /tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/objs-arm-eabi/ld/ld-new   -o tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers-short1 -L/tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/binutils-2.21.90/ld/testsuite/ld-arm --no-fix-arm1176 --section-start destsect=0x00009000 --section-start .text=0x8000 tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers.o
>> Executing on host: sh -c {/tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/objs-arm-eabi/ld/ld-new   -o tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers-short1 -L/tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/binutils-2.21.90/ld/testsuite/ld-arm --no-fix-arm1176 --section-start destsect=0x00009000 --section-start .text=0x8000 tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers.o 2>&1}  /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
>> Executing on host: sh -c {/tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/objs-arm-eabi/ld/../binutils/objdump -d tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers-short1 >dump.out 2>ld.stderr}  /dev/null  (timeout = 300)
>> /tmp/binutils-2.21.90-sc/objs-arm-eabi/ld/../binutils/objdump -d tmpdir/jump-reloc-veneers-short1
>> regexp_diff match failure
>> regexp "^    9000:      e7fe            b.n     9000 <dest>$"
>> line   "    9000:       f7ff bffe       b.w     9000 <dest>"
>> FAIL: R_ARM_THM_JUMP24 Relocation veneers: Short 1
>> 
>> Tell me if you need more.
>> 
>> Tristan.
>> 
>> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]