This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gold assert after "relocation refers to discarded section" warnings

From: Cary Coutant <ccoutant at google dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:00:30 -0700
Subject: Re: gold assert after "relocation refers to discarded section" warnings
References: <CAHACq4pECqV2pZZKjwcGTMFcns5DcGkbTs80kGiTy8bm4d4puA@mail.gmail.com> <mcrobxwmgz4.fsf@coign.corp.google.com>

> Actually, though, why is there no GOT offset assigned? ?The code which
> sets the GOT offset is independent of the code which notices that the
> symbol is defined in a discarded section. ?It seems like we should still
> see the GOT reloc against the symbol.

You're right, there should be one. I need to dig deeper...

-cary

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gold assert after "relocation refers to discarded section" warnings
  - From: Cary Coutant
- Re: gold assert after "relocation refers to discarded section" warnings
  - From: Cary Coutant

References:
- gold assert after "relocation refers to discarded section" warnings
  - From: Cary Coutant
- Re: gold assert after "relocation refers to discarded section" warnings
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]