This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 07/05/2011 16:58, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 07/05/2011 16:06, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>> Any comments on the implementation, while we're waiting? Or OK as it is?
>>>>
>>> Do you have a testcase to show it fails without your change?
>> Nope, but I guess we could try and extract one from the gcc/g++ testsuite;
>> pretty much every testcase that involves EH or typeinfo is busted without it.
>
> I don't see any LTO failures on Linux/x86 with the current BFD linker.
>
I'll have to retest then. I did initially get this many (attached)
failures, but it's possible that Alan's pr12365 (or related) changes resolved
them somehow.
cheers,
DaveK
Attachment:
summary2.log
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |