This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] Convert coff64-rs6000.c to iso-c


Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> writes:
>  /* Relocation functions */
> -static bfd_boolean xcoff64_reloc_type_br
> -  PARAMS ((XCOFF_RELOC_FUNCTION_ARGS));
> +static bfd_boolean xcoff64_reloc_type_br (XCOFF_RELOC_FUNCTION_ARGS);

BFD style is to have the (...) on the next line, regardless of whether
it fits on the current one:

static bfd_boolean xcoff64_reloc_type_br
  (XCOFF_RELOC_FUNCTION_ARGS);

> @@ -241,14 +238,11 @@ bfd_boolean (*xcoff64_calculate_relocation[XCOFF_MAX_CALCULATE_RELOCATION])
>  #define coff_bfd_reloc_type_lookup xcoff64_reloc_type_lookup
>  #define coff_bfd_reloc_name_lookup xcoff64_reloc_name_lookup
>  #ifdef AIX_CORE
> -extern const bfd_target * rs6000coff_core_p
> -  PARAMS ((bfd *abfd));
> +extern const bfd_target * rs6000coff_core_p (bfd *abfd);
>  extern bfd_boolean rs6000coff_core_file_matches_executable_p
> -  PARAMS ((bfd *cbfd, bfd *ebfd));
> -extern char *rs6000coff_core_file_failing_command
> -  PARAMS ((bfd *abfd));
> -extern int rs6000coff_core_file_failing_signal
> -  PARAMS ((bfd *abfd));
> +  (bfd *cbfd, bfd *ebfd);
> +extern char *rs6000coff_core_file_failing_command (bfd *abfd);
> +extern int rs6000coff_core_file_failing_signal (bfd *abfd);
>  #define CORE_FILE_P rs6000coff_core_p
>  #define coff_core_file_failing_command \
>    rs6000coff_core_file_failing_command

Same here.

>  {
>    union internal_auxent *in = (union internal_auxent *) inp;
>    union external_auxent *ext = (union external_auxent *) extp;
>  
> -  memset ((PTR) ext, 0, bfd_coff_auxesz (abfd));
> +  memset ((void *) ext, 0, bfd_coff_auxesz (abfd));

Just drop the (PTR) conversion.  (void *) casts aren't necessary
and tend to make things less readable.  We certainly won't be able
to enforce explicit (void *) casts for future changes, so the code
would become inconsistent.

Same throughout.

> @@ -2829,16 +2750,11 @@ const bfd_target rs6000coff64_vec =
>      (void *) &bfd_xcoff_backend_data,
>    };
>  
> -extern const bfd_target *xcoff64_core_p
> -  PARAMS ((bfd *));
> -extern bfd_boolean xcoff64_core_file_matches_executable_p
> -  PARAMS ((bfd *, bfd *));
> -extern char *xcoff64_core_file_failing_command
> -  PARAMS ((bfd *));
> -extern int xcoff64_core_file_failing_signal
> -  PARAMS ((bfd *));
> -#define xcoff64_core_file_pid \
> -  _bfd_nocore_core_file_pid
> +extern const bfd_target *xcoff64_core_p (bfd *);
> +extern bfd_boolean xcoff64_core_file_matches_executable_p (bfd *, bfd *);
> +extern char *xcoff64_core_file_failing_command (bfd *);
> +extern int xcoff64_core_file_failing_signal (bfd *);
> +#define xcoff64_core_file_pid _bfd_nocore_core_file_pid

More cases where the params should stay on their current line.

OK with those changes, thanks.

Richard


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]