This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] ENUM_BITFIELD broke GDB [Re: Change bfd_link_hash_entry.type to a bitfield?]

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, richard dot sandiford at linaro dot org
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 17:28:15 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch] ENUM_BITFIELD broke GDB [Re: Change bfd_link_hash_entry.type to a bitfield?]
References: <g41v0v6cq6.fsf@linaro.org> <BANLkTi=LgfKOP9bEGM9r32hAMUNT3w97LA@mail.gmail.com> <20110424101401.GQ19947@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20110424144908.GA21444@host1.jankratochvil.net>

Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

> +/* Be conservative and only use enum bitfields with GCC.
> +   FIXME: provide a complete autoconf test for buggy enum bitfields.
> +   This is copied from gcc 4.7.8, system.h.  */

What is gcc 4.7.8?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] ENUM_BITFIELD broke GDB
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

References:
- Re: Change bfd_link_hash_entry.type to a bitfield?
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: PR12365 and common symbols
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Change bfd_link_hash_entry.type to a bitfield?
  - From: Alan Modra
- [patch] ENUM_BITFIELD broke GDB [Re: Change bfd_link_hash_entry.type to a bitfield?]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]