This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: [ld] Makefile.in was regenerated incorrectly?
- From: "Weddington, Eric" <Eric dot Weddington at atmel dot com>
- To: "Mingjie Xing" <mingjie dot xing at gmail dot com>, "binutils" <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: "Hui Zhu" <teawater at gmail dot com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 07:34:57 -0600
- Subject: RE: [ld] Makefile.in was regenerated incorrectly?
- References: <BANLkTin4bK5tf8VK5ViUk9OhH6Thh65Wqg@mail.gmail.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mingjie Xing [mailto:mingjie.xing@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 3:47 AM
> To: binutils; Weddington, Eric
> Cc: Hui Zhu
> Subject: [ld] Makefile.in was regenerated incorrectly?
>
> Hi,
>
> The last regenerated ld/Makefile.in contains eavrtiny10 (see
> http://sourceware.org/cgi-
> bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/Makefile.in.diff?r1=1.325&r2=1.326&cvsroot=src&only_
> with_tag=HEAD&f=h
> ), which is not appear in Makefile.am. And also
> emulparams/avrtiny10.sh does not exist at all.
>
> So Makefile.in was regenerated incorrectly?
Working on it now...