Re: PATCH SET: DragonFly BSD, config.guess, and config.rpath

[MFL Commissioner <mfl-commissioner at marino dot st>]

On 3/9/2011 4:18 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 16:48:09 John Marino wrote:
> > 2011-03-08  John Marino<binutils@marino.st>
> >
> >          * bfd/config.bfd: Add x86_64-*-dragonfly*, fix i386-*-dragonfly*
> >          * bfd/configure.in: Delete unused bfd_elf32_i386_dragonfly_vec
> >          * bfd/configure: Regenerate.
> changelog paths are relative to the file they go into.  since these entries go
> into bfd/ChangeLog, the paths should be relative to that.  so drop "bfd/" from
> all of these.

Okay, that was a mistake on my part.  But can whoever commits this just 
fix it on the fly?  Is another set of file submissions really 
necessary?  (aimed at somebody that can commit these, not you Mike)


> > 3) config.guess.current.patch
> > 4) config.guess.221.patch
> > Pending GCC requirements, the preceding patches will update config.guess
> > to the last version defined by project/config.  Use the following commit
> > message: 2011_MM_DD_changelog.guess.txt
> >
> >
> > 5) config.rpath.current.patch
> > 6) config.rpath.221.patch
> > Pending GCC requirements, the preceding patches will update config.guess
> > to the last version defined by project/gnulib.  Use the following commit
> > message: 2011_MM_DD_changelog.repath.txt
> btw, when Ralf talked about gcc, he meant they should be submitted to gcc-
> patches@gcc.gnu.org first.
> -mike

Ok. That wasn't clear what he meant.

Regards,
John