This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [5/6][PATCH] Perform second link stage and ignore now-obsolete linker -pass-through= option.

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Rafael Ãvila de EspÃndola <respindola at mozilla dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 10:54:01 -0800
Subject: Re: [5/6][PATCH] Perform second link stage and ignore now-obsolete linker -pass-through= option.
References: <4D684CB8.6020106@gmail.com> <4D684D00.70803@gmail.com> <4D684D69.7060907@gmail.com> <4D687B6C.1030301@mozilla.com>

Rafael Ãvila de EspÃndola <respindola@mozilla.com> writes:

> Assuming this is ok for bfd, would a patch implementing the same logic
> be ok for gold? It would be bad to have different interfaces in bfd ld
> and gold.

What is the actual difference in behaviour?

I am going to continue to argue strenuously against rescanning all the
symbol tables of the input files in gold.  If GNU ld wants to rescan all
the symbol tables, I suppose that's OK with me, as long as gold is not
required to do it.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [5/6][PATCH] Perform second link stage and ignore now-obsolete linker -pass-through= option.
  - From: Rafael Ãvila de EspÃndola

References:
- [PATCH,trunk+2.20] Fix issues in ld.bfd plugin interface [0/6]
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: [PATCH,trunk+2.21] Fix issues in ld.bfd plugin interface [0/6]
  - From: Dave Korn
- [5/6][PATCH] Perform second link stage and ignore now-obsolete linker -pass-through= option.
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: [5/6][PATCH] Perform second link stage and ignore now-obsolete linker -pass-through= option.
  - From: Rafael Ávila de Espíndola

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]