This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PATCH: PR binutils/12283: bfd/doc doesn't support parallel build
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
- Cc: Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 19:36:07 +0100
- Subject: Re: PATCH: PR binutils/12283: bfd/doc doesn't support parallel build
- References: <AANLkTikAd7jWXN+2bi-OeR_-cQq7ivpSyVz+4165trVS@mail.gmail.com> <201101282332.p0SNWFT04949@lucas.cup.hp.com> <20110129094232.GD11288@gmx.de> <1296498781.12233.80.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <20110204063423.GC14132@gmx.de> <m2zkqbwuvk.fsf@igel.home> <1297814811.2267.5.camel@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <20110216050850.GA26163@gmx.de>
Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de> writes:
> My idea was to clean stamp-chew when $(MKDOC) was cleaned (i.e., in
> MOSTLYCLEANFILES). It should not be a problem if the texi files rules'
> get triggered for the user of a tarball, because the generated files
> should be identical. Even if the rules for the info files get
> triggered, they should not be a problem because of the 'missing' script.
> But I'd really like to test this well before proposing a new patch.
The current dependencies carefully chosen to avoid regenerating the
files when no sources are modified and the time stamps are preserved
(otherwise you could just depend on $(MKDOC) directly).
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."