This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 8:10 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:53 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Quentin Neill >> <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 16:32, Quentin Neill >>>> <quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> These two patches add support for BMI and TBM ISAs to be introduced in >>>>> AMD bdver2 processors. >>>>> >>>>> The full encoding specification is delayed, however I have posted >>>>> abbreviated specs on the gcc mailing list: >>>>> BMI: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01766.html >>>>> TBM: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01767.html >>>>> >>>> >>>> Looks like your patch is reversed. ?Could you please send another one >>>> that you get from git format-patch -1 >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Sebastian >>> >>> Oops. ?Reposting with reversed patch. ?Thanks for reviewing Sebastian. >>> -- >>> Quentin >>> >> >> Please don't add ModrmRegExt, There are many examples in i386-opt.tbl >> without ModrmRegExt. >> >> > > You should check i.tm.extension_opcode != None instead. > > -- > H.J. Fixed with the attached. Tested and passes with "make check RUNTESTFLAGS=i386.exp". Okay to commit? -- Quentin
Attachment:
7041_bdver2_bmi.diff.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |