This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch x64 SEH]: Sort pdata section ascending


> +#if !defined(COFF_WITH_pep) && defined(COFF_WITH_pex64)
> +  asection *sec;
> +#endif
>  
...
> +/* If there is a .pdata section and we have linked pdata finally, we
> +     need to sort the entries ascending.  */
> +#if !defined(COFF_WITH_pep) && defined(COFF_WITH_pex64)
> +    sec = bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".pdata");
> +    if (sec)

It's better to merge this into the ifdef code block below.
I.e.

#if foo
  {
    asection *sec;
    sec = bfd_get...
  }
#endif

Watch your indentation; it's incorrect for both the comment
and the code.  Although the code indentation will be correct
once you wrap the new { } around it.

> +      bfd_size_type x = sec->rawsize ? sec->rawsize : sec->size;
...
> +	  qsort (contents, (size_t) ((sec->size <x ? sec->size : x) / 12), 12, sort_x64_pdata);

I wonder if some sort of error/warning should be generated
for section size incorrect.  When is rawsize != size here?

> +      if (!x || !bfd_get_section_contents (abfd, sec, pfinfo->contents, 0, x))
...
> +      if (contents && x != 0)

Merge this into a single IF statement.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]