This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: confused about symbol version table

From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
To: Pan ruochen <panruochen at gmail dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:56:16 -0700
Subject: Re: confused about symbol version table
References: <AANLkTi=7tw+xUNpdBcMycavRQ=Oi8_8-Vrt22z9vJpuC@mail.gmail.com> <20100723060510.GZ19525@bubble.grove.modra.org> <AANLkTimaO-CzpUtE+2_2SReJ4Kivy+ycXQeDUNbXW--h@mail.gmail.com>

Pan ruochen <panruochen@gmail.com> writes:

> Do these descriptions not mean a dynamic section contains an array of
> ELF32_Dyn entries?

They do mean that.

However, the relevant data here is not the PT_DYNAMIC segment, it is the
DT_SYMTAB section referenced from the PT_DYNAMIC segment.  In section
terms, it is the .dynsym section, not the .dynamic section.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: confused about symbol version table
  - From: Pan ruochen

References:
- confused about symbol version table
  - From: Pan ruochen
- Re: confused about symbol version table
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: confused about symbol version table
  - From: Pan ruochen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]